Directive to Ban Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering and Aerial Aerosol Spraying in the United Kingdom (21-Dec-2013)

Share on Pinterest

…but don’t just share! Send the Directive to your MP too! »

Click to download this Directive in PDF format (First edition & UAPA available here.)

Click here to send this Directive to your MP

Directive to Ban Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering and Aerial Aerosol Spraying in the United Kingdom (21-Dec-2013)

A public demand to ban stratospheric aerosol geoengineering, weather modification, cloud seeding and the deliberate aerial spraying of chemical aerosols.


Introduction

The notion of anthropogenic (man-made) global warming (AGW) has been a contentious issue for several years, and is continually subject to vociferous opposition.

The touted solution to the AGW problem is geoengineering. It is defined as “the deliberate large scale intervention in the earth’s climate system in order to moderate global warming” and is becoming regulated by the House of Commons. [1]

One branch of geoengineering, called stratospheric aerosol geoengineering (SAG), is of particular concern – and may also be unnecessary.[2]

With government agencies admitting geoengineering operations are potentially disastrous, a moratorium[3] was placed in 2010, with its 193 signatories agreeing to place a current ban on such geoengineering projects with the exemption, however, of “small-scale scientific research studies”, weather modification and carbon capture.

The purpose of this Directive is to advance the moratorium with a permanent ban on stratospheric aerosol geoengineering, weather modification, cloud seeding and the deliberate aerial spraying of chemical aerosols – military or otherwise – due to the severity of the issues and reasons as set out in this document.


Climate Change may not be man-made

With geoengineering being defined as “the deliberate large scale intervention in the earth’s climate system in order to moderate global warming”, a brief presentation of the arguments of climate change is presented here.

Whilst all eminent scientists agree that climate change is indeed occurring, there is a significant divide between them. Whilst some advocate the idea of carbon-related (man-made) anthropogenic global warming (AGW), others insist that climate change is a natural phenomenon that has been occurring for thousands of years and that the planet is actually cooling rather than warming. This section presents a brief overview of the claims made by both sides of the debate.

Arguments for AGW

The main proponent for AGW is the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, a political branch of the UN)[4], who makes the following claims:

  1. Global temperatures have been increased over the last 150 years, in accordance with industrialisation and the increased burning of fossil fuels.
  2. Sea levels are rising.
  3. Arctic and Antarctic ice is reducing.
  4. No global warming has been recorded for 17 years, but that is because more of the heat has gone into the oceans.

Arguments against AGW

The IPCC claims have been countered by various bodies, including the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC, a body of 40 independent scientists)[5] as follows:

  1. Despite us putting more CO2 into the atmosphere, there has been no measured global increase in temperatures for 17 years. [6]
  2. There has been an ongoing sea level rise of approx. 7” per century since the last ice age.
  3. The amount of Arctic and Antarctic ice is increasing not decreasing. [7]
  4. There is no evidence supporting the oceans-absorbing-heat theory.

Such is the intensity of the opposition, over 30,000 US scientists have also petitioned that climate change is a natural phenomenon and that carbon dioxide emissions are not a significant factor. [8]

Amongst the many claims made to discredit scientists or groups within the climate change debate, the most pronounced appears to be the IPCC’s own admission that their incorrect prediction of the Himalayan glaciers melting by 2035 was not based on scientific research. [9] This fuelled concerns about the background of the IPCC, which is a political, non-scientific and opinion-based branch of the United Nations with a restricted brief of investigation. [10]

The misunderstandings surrounding global warming may well be intentional, with the Council of Foreign Relations admitting they spend literally millions to deliberately confuse us on the subject. [11]


Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering (SAG)

The term geoengineering is used to describe the intervening steps that could be taken by man to combat (man-made) anthropogenic global warming (AGW). As previously presented in this document, there is huge doubt surrounding the idea of AGW which, in itself, leads to concerns that geoengineering measures may be unnecessary and, therefore, be a possible waste of time, money and resources.

Of utmost concern, however, are the risks that are associated with geoengineering. And whilst many geoengineering practices are already patented[12] and underway[13], attention must be paid to one particular aspect of geoengineering, Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering (SAG) which includes a technique known as Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI).

SAI is essentially the spraying of aerosols (typically aluminium oxide, barium, strontium, sulphuric acid and other toxic substances) by aeroplanes into the Earth’s atmosphere, modifying the weather to affect local and global climate. The idea is to create artificial cloud cover that will reflect sun radiation back into space with the purported intention of reducing the Earth’s atmospheric temperature. [14]

Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering is currently being proposed as a Solar Radiation Management (SRM) technique,[15] with submissions for testing being already accepted by the Solar Radiation Management Government Initiative (SRMGI). [16]


Benefits of SAG

There are no proven benefits of SAG to the general population. Beneficiaries, however, may include the following:

  • Financial gains for the organisations and people associated with these programs – e.g., manipulating then betting on the weather[17] [18] and betting on food prices. [19]
  • GMO corporations (e.g., Monsanto) having a control of food supply with their abiotic stress resistant GM seeds. (see following ‘Risks of SAG’ section)
  • Countries who may gain a military advantage through controlling the weather and manipulating the atmosphere. [20] [21]

Whether such SAG operations will actually reduce global temperatures (should this even be necessary) is in dispute, as presented later in this document.


Risks of SAG

The proposal of climate geoengineering – presently banned by the UN moratorium3 – is to spray vast amounts of heavy metals and other toxic substances into the atmosphere[22], with which there are numerous concerns:

  • The Solar Radiation Management Research Governance Initiative (SRMGI) itself concludes the range of SRM research includes “potentially risky, large-scale experiments in the real world.” [23]
  • The United States’ own Government Accountability Office states “not one geoengineering technique is safe and their implementation could cause more damage than the supposed catastrophe they intend to avoid.” [24]
  • A Harvard University study also reveals the lethal consequence of tiny particles in the atmosphere. [25] (Such toxic particulates in the atmosphere are one of the consequences of Aerial Aerosol Spraying.)
  • The Neurotoxicology (brain poisoning) division of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says that exposure to airborne Particulate Matter “is an environmental health risk of global proportions.[26]
  • Increases in neurological disorders, like Alzheimer’s disease, that are linked to aluminium which raises concerns about the fallout of aluminium from Aerial Aerosol Spraying. [27] [28]
  • Increase of ‘global dimming’ [29] – Over 20% of the sun’s direct rays are no longer reaching the planet – believed to be caused by an increase in air pollution.
  • Poor crop yields caused by abiotic stress (e.g., drought, heavy metal contamination, too much moisture, fungal overgrowth – all consequences of Aerial Aerosol Spraying)[30] cornering farmers into purchasing aluminium- and abiotic stress-resistant GM seed. [31] [32]
  • Increase in diseases based on vitamin D deficiency, like Rickets, due to lack of sunlight on the skin. [33]
  • Further damage to the ozone layer. [34] [35] [36]
  • Blue skies artificially turning white. [37]
  • Severe weather conditions, droughts and flooding. [38]
  • Increased chances of climate-related international conflict. [39] [40]
  • Spraying toxic substances in our environment is not going to be good for us. common sense

Whilst some of these issues may represent an obvious opportunity for certain stakeholders to profiteer, each issue is a risk that poses a real, serious problem for the rest of us.

Further, when considering the views of the many imminent scientists and organisations that disagree with the underlying concept of man-made climate change, casting doubt on the very notion of Anthropogenic Global Warming, it can be concluded that these may all be unnecessary risks.

Other Aerial Aerosol Spraying Activities

In addition to Stratospheric Aerosol Engineering, it is pertinent to examine other aerial spraying programmes that have been associated (officially or otherwise) with the UK and are not held in a moratorium.

Weather Modification

In 2010, during the House of Commons meeting on the regulation of geoengineering, weather modification was officially removed from the definition and no longer regarded as geoengineering. Weather modification is described by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) as purposefully augmenting precipitation, reducing hail damage, dispersing fog and other types of cloud and storm modifications – using techniques such as cloud seeding. Such technologies, according to the WMO are still striving to achieve a sound scientific foundation, despite various operational programmes taking place in the atmosphere over many countries around the world. [41]

Weather Warfare

Whilst the term ‘chemtrails’ (a contraction of ‘chemical trails’) may be dismissed by some as a silly word to describe a silly idea, it should be noted that the term was used in the USA’s own Space Preservation Act of 2001[42] when proposing which exotic weapons systems should be banned – but was omitted from the final draft, so was therefore not banned and is still permitted.

The term was first introduced by the Department of Defense as the title for a US Air Force’s Chemistry course training manual[43], and is now so common that it features in the Oxford dictionary[44] (despite citing an incorrect origin).

Cloud seeding and modifying the ionosphere via chemical injection is described in pages 24, 29 and 30 of the US Document, Weather as a force multiplier: Owning the weather by 2025. [45] It is used in conjunction with associated electromagnetic frequency technologies (such as HAARP [46] – a new generation of sophisticated weaponry under the US Strategic Defense Initiative, jointly managed by the US Air Force and the US Navy) as revealed by World-renowned scientist, Dr. Rosalie Bertell, who confirms that “US military scientists are working on weather systems as a potential weapon” and that, “The methods include the enhancing of storms and the diverting of vapor rivers in the Earth’s atmosphere to produce targeted droughts or floods.” [47]

Chemical Weapons Testing

It is commonplace to associate chemical weapons with middle eastern countries. However, it should be noted that the testing of chemical weapons has also been performed on the British public. This only became public knowledge as recently as 2002 with a government report revealing biological trials using aerial spraying were performed on the British public between 1940 and 1979. [48] [49]

Deliberate Causation of Weather Extremes

As illustrated in the previous Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering (SAG) section, jet aircraft trails are being implicated as, somehow, both the cause of and the solution to climate change and weather extremes.

With the IPCC’s own Climate Scientist, Dr Joyce Penner, stating “The contrails that are spreading that you can identify as contrails, those would tend to warm the atmosphere”, [50] the idea that SAG would reduce the issue of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) is highly debatable.

An IPCC Special Report also confirms “Contrails tend to warm the Earth’s surface, similar to thin high clouds” [51] – again, suggesting that SAG would be a cause of climate change rather than a solution.

Such a view is supported by numerous claims that engineering an artificial layer in the Earth’s stratosphere could trap in more heat than it reflects, thereby increasing global temperatures. [52] [53] [54]

It is becoming common knowledge that the delivery methods of SAG may cause significant problems, notably climate change and possible ozone depletion. [55]

Given the highly contentious nature of the AGW issue, the concerns about the IPCC and the evidence presented in the following section, the true intention of any aerial spraying activity (along with its consequences) should be carefully considered.

 


All Aerial Spraying must be banned

This section presents an abundance of evidence that Aerial Aerosol Spraying activities are already underway, and concludes with what action must be taken.

Evidence that Aerial Spraying activities have already started

Regardless of their underlying reason, there is an abundance of evidence that Aerial Aerosol Spraying activities have already started:

  • UK rainwater test results contaminated with high levels of heavy metals (e.g., aluminium) and abnormal pH. [56]
  • The formidable rise in so-called ‘chemtrails’ phenomenon which includes literally millions of observations and experiences that are not compatible with the official ‘contrails’ explanation.[57] [58]
  • The vast majority of persistent trails in the sky do not come from commercial flights as the planes involved usually don’t appear on www.flightradar24.com (whereas over 80% of commercial UK flights do).
  • Unusual phenomenon of “on-off” aircraft trail output (abrupt and/or intermittent) with no effect on planes’ altitude – witnessed regularly and captured up-close on video. [59]
  • Circumstantial evidence of the emergence of multiple, persistent contrails spreading and turning our blue skies white – the desired result of SAG operations. (see previous section)
  • Anecdotal evidence of two planes flying at similar altitudes, locations and times, where one plane leaves no trail, but the other leaves a trail that persists for hours.
  • The modern-day sky, routinely filled with persistent trails forming the patterns of tramlines, asterisks and noughts-and-crosses boards. Whilst air traffic has doubled over the last 20 years, seemingly no-one can recall such a phenomenon ever occurring before the early-1990’s. (And this is despite fuels of 20 years ago not being as clean as they are today.)
  • Extreme weather behaviour (including the breaking of thousands of UK and US weather records and unprecedented amount of UK floods warnings) coinciding with increased Aerial Aerosol Spraying activities over recent years – consistent with NASA’s claim that “contrails, especially persistent contrails, represent a human-caused increase in the Earth’s cloudiness, and are likely to be affecting climate and ultimately our natural resources.” [60]
  • Global dimming. [61] [62]
  • Whistleblower evidence from former US government (CIA, US Air Force and NSA) employee with cryptographic clearance, A C Griffths, revealing his involvement with “the chemtrail program”. [63]
  • Photographic evidence. [64] A small number of examples are shown here:

 

 

Chemtrails UK Geoengineering UK London 14 September 2012

This photo shows the ‘persistent contrail’ phenomenon hitting London on 14th September 2012. Such skies cannot be recalled before 1997 but are occurring with increased frequency in recent years.

 

Time to re-think?

An extreme example of persistent trails that clearly does not match the official explanation of them coming from commercial planes.

 


On-off spraying captured on video by a pilot.


Low altitude on-off spraying from military planes captured by a pedestrian.

That deliberate Aerial Aerosol Spraying activities are being performed now is not just the most likely explanation, but it is the only explanation that fits with all the available evidence.


The Moratorium

The Geoengineering Moratorium under the UN Convention on Biological Diversity3 was agreed by the 193 signatories to the convention in order to outlaw geoengineering projects “until there is an adequate scientific basis on which to justify such activities and appropriate consideration of the associated risks for the environment and biodiversity and associated social, economic and cultural impacts”.

Unfortunately for the public, the agreement exempted “small-scale scientific research studies”, weather modification and carbon capture.

The main purpose of this Directive, therefore, is to advance the moratorium with a permanent ban on geoengineering, weather modification, cloud seeding and the deliberate aerial spraying of chemical aerosols.

We’ve been sprayed before

The evidence abounds that Aerial Aerosol Spraying of chemicals is being performed over the UK, undisclosed and without our consent. Whilst this may seem like a bizarre notion, it should be noted that the UK population has been sprayed before by aeroplanes in secret tests as admitted by the British government. [65] [66]

This notion that we’re being already sprayed would also be consistent with the World Meteorological Organisation’s claim that “there are dozens of nations operating hundreds of weather modification projects” and that “In recent years there has been a decline in the support for weather modification research, and a tendency to move directly into operational projects.” [67]

Unearthed documents also expose RAF artificial rainmaking experiments as the cause of the Lynmouth (Devon) floods of 1952. [68]

Further information on previous spraying programmes is available in an independent scientific analysis, Case Orange, commissioned by Belgium environmental watchdog, the Belfort Group. [69]

 


We’re being sprayed again

Should any doubt remain that a covert operation (such as occurred 50 years ago in the UK, where the public were unwittingly used as guinea pigs) is not being conducted again, one only has to consider the SRMGI’s own declaration that they should keep the general public “informed on what GE (geoengineering) is for, but don’t necessarily ask their permission.” [70]

UK Parliament itself admits, “We consider that a ban, even a short-term ban, on all SRM geoengineering testing would prevent work on geoengineering as “Plan B”. It may well also be unenforceable and be counter-productive as those carrying out tests do so in secrecy.” [71]

It must also be acknowledged that if the aerial activities occurring today are military-based, the secrecy is being upheld by the Official Secrets Act. [72]

Regardless of their nature, being perpetrated on the British public without their knowledge or permission, the current aerial aerosol spraying activities are in violation of:

  • The 1978 Environmental Modification Treaty (ENMOD) [73]
  • The Nuremburg Code [74]
  • The Unified Atmospheric Preservation Act [75]
  • UN Nagoya Convention on Biological Diversity, 2010 (establishing a ban on some forms of geoengineering) [76]
  • The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (articles 3,6 & 8) [77]
  • The UNECE Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters [78]
  • Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 [79]
  • Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union (articles 3, 6 and 37) [80]

And must be removed from

  • The Official Secrets Act.

Take Action.

We must do something about this, because without our intervention, vast amounts of toxic substances will continue to be sprayed into the atmosphere. Such activities, as well as being possibly unnecessary, are untested and already verging on the catastrophic for man, animals and our environment.

We therefore demand the Government of the United Kingdom take the following actions:

  1. To fully inform the Wider General public of the United Kingdom about all atmospheric aerosol injection and spraying programmes – whether they are weather modification, geoengineering activities, experimental, testing or otherwise – and to explain why such activities are being allowed to take place in UK airspace without our fully informed permission or consent.
  2. Granting of independent and government investigations of aerial spraying, including aircraft inspection and regulation of aircraft, aircraft fuel and aircraft emissions.
  3. To advance the UN moratorium with the banning and cessation of climate geoengineering, weather modification, cloud seeding and the deliberate aerial spraying of chemical aerosols that occur in UK airspace without the permission and consent of the majority of the wider general public.
  4. To ensure any solar radiation management technique may only be reconsidered after a public debate on anthropogenic global warming and all forms of geoengineering (including solar radiation management and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering) has been conducted and concluded, with leading, independent figures from each side of the argument involved throughout.
  5. To end the military’s ability to exempt itself from all treaties that govern our health and wellbeing, such as:
    • The 1989 Official Secrets Act, 1978 Environmental Modification Treaty (ENMOD)
    • The Nuremburg Code
    • The UN Nagoya Convention on Biological Diversity, 2001
    • The Universal Declaration of Human Rights The UNECE Aarhus Convention
    • Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001
    • Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union
    • The Unified Atmospheric Preservation Act (UAPA).
  6. To bring the Unified Atmospheric Preservation Act (UAPA) into law.

 


Glossary

AGW – Anthropogenic (man-made) Global Warming

ENMOD – 1978 Environmental Modification Treaty

HAARP – High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program

GAO – US Government Accountability Office

GE – Geoengineering

IPCC – International Panel on Climate Change

NIPCC – Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change

SAG – Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering

SAI – Stratospheric Aerosol Injection

SRM – Solar Radiation Management

SRMGI – Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative

UAPA – Unified Atmospheric Preservation Act

USGCRP – US Global Change Research Program

WMO – World Meteorological Organization

 

Revision History

01-Feb-2012 – First publication.

01-Dec-2013 – Main changes: total rewrite; IPCC and NIPCC introduction.

21-Dec-2013 – Main changes: inclusion of ban to include all aerial aerosol spraying (i.e., not just stratospheric aerosol geoengineering).

 

 


[1] The Regulation of Geoengineering (Fifth Report of Session 2009-10), House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (March 2010), http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/221/221.pdf

[2] Discussed in following section of this document

[3] The Geoengineering Moratorium under the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, http://www.etcgroup.org/sites/www.etcgroup.org/files/publication/pdf_file/ETCMoratorium_note101110.pdf

[4] 2013 Summary for Policymakers, International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (September 2013) – http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/uploads/WGIAR5-SPM_Approved27Sep2013.pdf

[7] And now it’s global COOLING! Return of Arctic ice cap as it grows by 29% in a year, Daily Mail (8 September 2013) – http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/And-global-COOLING-Return-Arctic-ice-cap-grows-29-year.html

[8] Global Warming Petition Project (aka OISM) – http://www.petitionproject.org/

[9] Glacier scientist: I knew data hadn’t been verified, Daily Mail (24 January 2010) – http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1245636/Glacier-scientists-says-knew-data-verified.html

[10] Summary of IPCC by NIPCC / The Heartland Institute scientists (September 2013) – http://youtu.be/jaVL1Ham-4A?t=12m47s

[11] Council of Foreign Relations discussion – http://youtu.be/r9S3y9QkmMg?t=2m37s

[12] List of geoengineering patents (includes Welsbach patent #5,003,186 for adding “tiny particles to the fuel of jet airliners, so that the particles would be emitted from the jet engines while the airliner was at its cruising altitude.”) – http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/links-to-geoengineering-patents/

[13] Geoengineering projects around the world – map, The Guardian (17 July 2012) – http://www.theguardian.com/environment/graphic/2012/jul/17/geoengineering-world-map

[14] Stratospheric Aerosols, The Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative – http://youtu.be/7oK7wmP2CFk?t=4m2s

[15] Tackling climate change with technology, BBC (17 November 2009) – http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8338853.stm

[16] SRMGI submissions for testing – http://www.srmgi.org/call-for-submissions/

[17] Betting on the weather, Financial Times (2 December 2011) – http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ff3e6712-1cf3-11e1-8daf-00144feabdc0.html

[18] “The only thing more powerful than weather is our ability to help you profit from it”, WSI (a weather trading company) – https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=WSI+the+only+thing+more+powerful+than+weather+is+our+ability+to+help+you+profit+from+it (last checked on 7 November 2013)

[19] Goldman bankers get rich betting on food prices as millions starve, The Independent (20 January 2013) – http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/goldman-bankers-get-rich-betting-on-food-prices-as-millions-starve-8459207.html

[20] Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 (A study designed to comply with a directive from the chief of staff of the Air Force to examine the concepts, capabilities, and technologies the United States will require to remain the dominant air and space force in the future, US Air Force (August 1996) – https://archive.org/download/WeatherAsAForceMultiplier/Weather%20as%20a%20Force%20Multiplier%20Owning%20the%20Weather%20in%202025.pdf

[21] At war over geoengineering, The Guardian (9 February 2012) – http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/09/at-war-over-geoengineering

[22] Tackling climate change with technology, BBC (17 November 2009) – http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8338853.stm

[23] Solar radiation management: the governance of research report key conclusions, SRMGI (1 December 2011) – http://www.srmgi.org/report/

[24] Technology Assessment: Climate Engineering, GAO (July 2011) – http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d1171.pdf

[25] Danger in the air: Atmospheric particles a fraction of the width of human hair could be driving climate change”, Daily Mail (31 July 2012) – http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2181623/Danger-air-Atmospheric-particles-fraction-width-human-hair-driving-climate-change.html

[26] Neurogenic inflammation and particulate matter (PM) air pollutants, US Environmental Protection Agency (December 2001) – http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11829413

[27] Link between Aluminum and the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease, National Institute of Health (5 January 2011) – http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056430/pdf/IJAD2011-276393.pdf

[28] What Chemtrails Are Doing To Your Brain, Neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock – http://consciouslifenews.com/chemtrails-doing-brain-neurosurgeon-dr-russell-blaylock-reveals-shocking-facts/

[29] What is global dimming?, Guardian (11 May 2012) – http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/may/11/global-dimming-pollution

[30] Agricultural Adaptation to a Changing Climate, USDA (July 2012) – http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/848748/err136.pdf

[31] Sorghum aluminum tolerance gene, SbMATE patent – http://www.google.co.uk/patents/US7582809

[32] Transgenic plants patent – http://www.google.co.uk/patents/US7888557

[33] Children are at risk of getting Rickets, says doctor, BBC (4 February 2011) – http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12357382

[34] Geoengineering Quick-Fix would Wreak Ozone Havoc, Wired (24 April 2008) – http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/04/geoengineering/

[35] ‘Unprecedented’ ozone hole opens over Canadian Arctic, National Post (2 October 2011) – http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/10/02/unprecedented-ozone-hole-opens-over-canadian-arctic/

[36] “geoengineering by means of sulfate aerosols is predicted to accelerate the hydroxyl catalyzed ozone destruction cycles and cause a significant depletion of the ozone layer” – The impact of geoengineering aerosols on stratospheric temperature and ozone, P Heckendorn et al (2009) – http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/4/4/045108/pdf/1748-9326_4_4_045108.pdf

[37] Climate engineering to ‘cure’ global warming could turn sunny blue skies WHITE, Daily Mail (6 June 2012) – http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2155450/Climate-engineering-cure-global-warming-turn-sky-WHITE-claim-scientists.html

[38] Climate Engineering, Wikipedia – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_engineering

[40] Mahmoud Ahmadinejad accuses the West of destroying Iran’s rain clouds, The Telegraph (10 September 2012) – http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/9533842/Mahmoud-Ahmadinejad-accuses-the-West-of-destroying-Irans-rain-clouds.html

[41] List of Ongoing Weather Modification Programs – http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/content/weather-modification

[42] HR 2977 Act (Space Preservation Act 2001) – http://www.fas.org/sgp/congress/2001/hr2977.pdf

[44] Oxford dictionary definition of “chemtrails” – http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/chemtrail?q=chemtrails

[45] Weather as a force multiplier: Owning the weather by 2025, US Air Force (August 1996) – http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf

[46] High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) – http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/212/45492.html

[47] Article by Michel Chossudovsky, Professor of Economics, University of Ottawa – http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO201A.html

[48] Millions were in germ war tests – “Much of Britain was exposed to bacteria sprayed in secret trials… Many of these tests involved releasing potentially dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms over vast swaths of the population without the public being told…”, The Guardian (21 April 2002) – http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2002/apr/21/uk.medicalscience

[49] MoD Test of Aerial Spraying over Norwich article, Mike Kenner – http://www.nr23.net/govt/spray.htm

[51] IPCC Special Report on Aviation and the Global Atmosphere – http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/spm/av-en.pdf

[52] NASA claimed in their October 2005 newsletter that persistent jet contrails forming man-made clouds and haze are: “…trapping warmth in the atmosphere and exacerbating global warming…”

[53] Atmospheric Scientists at Stanford University show that aircraft vapour trails produced 15-20% of the warming in the Arctic, Nature News (21 December 2009) – http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/sites/default/files/file/geo_current_116/116J_2009_NASA_Jet_Aircraft_Emissions_Contribute_Global_Warming_20_in_Arctic_DEC_21_2009_New_Stanford_Study_Mark_Jacobson.pdf

[54] Global Geoengineering Fueling Venus Syndrome, GeoEngineering Watch – http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/global-geoengineering-fueling-venus-syndrome/

[55] Stratospheric Sulphate Aerosol Geoengineering, Wikipedia (Decemeber 2013) – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratospheric_sulfate_aerosols_%28geoengineering%29

[56] Rainwater Test Kit Results Map, Chemtrails Project UK – https://www.chemtrailsprojectuk.com/evidence/rainwater-test-kit-results-map/

[57] Google videos search for “chemtrails”: 19,500,000 results (October 2013) – https://www.google.co.uk/#q=chemtrails&tbm=vid.

[58] Google web search for “chemtrails”: 4,880,000 results (October 2013) – https://www.google.co.uk/#q=chemtrails.

[59] Chemtrail Tanker Up-Close with ON and OFF Spraying pilot video – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnWO5KT8IhI

[60] K-12 Students as Ground Observers of Contrails in Support of Scientific Research, NASA – http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/33E_2004_NASA_Children_Contrails_Study.pdf

[61] What is global dimming?, Guardian (11 May 2012) – http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/may/11/global-dimming-pollution

[62] BBC Global Dimming Documentary About Geoengineering & Global Warminghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8RyNSzQDaU

[63] A C Griffith talking about his involvement with Project Cloverleaf, “the chemtrail program”, The Power Hour (14 May 2007) – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udEtOc2IFO8

[64] Various SAG / chemtrail photos, mostly from UK – http://www.cpuk.org/evidence/photos/

[65] Millions were in germ war tests – “Much of Britain was exposed to bacteria sprayed in secret trials… Many of these tests involved releasing potentially dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms over vast swaths of the population without the public being told…”, The Guardian (21 April 2002) – http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2002/apr/21/uk.medicalscience

[66] ‘Millions exposed’ in 1960s experiments – “During the early 1960s millions of people were exposed to clouds of radioactive xenon gas from the Harwell Nuclear Research Establishment, the BBC has discovered… in July 1961, men in white body suits released large clouds of the gas over English towns and villages to help estimate what effect a biological or chemical warfare attack would have on Britain.”, BBC (13 September 2002) – http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2254664.stm

[67] WMO documents on weather modifications, World Meteorological Organization (September 2007) – http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/arep/wwrp/new/documents/WM_statement_guidelines_approved.pdf

[68] RAF rainmakers ‘caused 1952 flood’, The Guardian (30 August 2001) – http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/aug/30/sillyseason.physicalsciences

[69] Case Orange research report on covert stratospheric aerosol geoengineering – http://www.belfort-group.eu/sites/default/files/page/2010/05/COpart1.pdf

[70] Minutes from SRMGI meeting regarding SRM research, SRMGI (September 2011) – http://www.srmgi.org/files/2011/09/Tuesday-Plenary-Goals-Concerns-and-Principles.pdf

[71] The Regulation of Geoengineering (Conclusions and recommendations), Science and Technology Committee (March 2010) – http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/221/22110.htm

[73] Environmental Modification Convention (ENMOD) – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_Modification_Convention

[77] The Universal Declaration of Human Rights – http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/

[78] The UNECE Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters – http://www.unece.org/env/pp/introduction.html

[79] Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment – http://www.ecolex.org/ecolex/ledge/view/RecordDetails?id=LEX-FAOC034996&index=documents

[80] Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – http://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf

Help spread awareness:
Share on Pinterest

116 Responses to “Directive to Ban Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering and Aerial Aerosol Spraying in the United Kingdom (21-Dec-2013)”

  1. steven1st December 2013 at 8:43 pm #

    it is quite clear to see the spraying of chemicals in our sky’s nearly every day conspiracy theory does not really wash any more

    • Olga Raffa
      Chemtrails Project UK1st December 2013 at 9:32 pm #

      It’s not a conspiracy, weather modification is a fact and geoengineering is in full effect!

      • johnnhy16th August 2016 at 5:43 pm #

        evergreen airlines went bankrupt they had tankers for spraying but went bust in 2013 and i think a uk company bought them and is contracted by the goverment to do their dirty work, good job keep up the good work

      • Yolande Letu6th January 2017 at 9:26 am #

        In fact what they are doing by praying us is called DEPOPULATION!

      • george10th January 2017 at 2:11 pm #

        hi im part of the scotland against geo-engineering group and i have been asked to write an article on this subject, i have read your article and i have to applaud you on this, would you mind if i used your article as it is very extensive and your research is commendable you are a warrior of the truth and so am i, like what you say this needs to be taken to the masses to mainstream the more people that are aware the more chance of change.

        • James Hodgskiss
          James Hodgskiss10th January 2017 at 6:28 pm #

          Hiya George, Yes, feel free to use the content of the Directive. If you could add a credit/link to Chemtrails Project UK, that would be appreciated. If you’d like to be added to our Resources page, can you get back to me with the details of your group/campaign. Best of luck with it all. Cheers, James

    • Oscar Sid16th February 2014 at 2:43 pm #

      I can confirm that from 2007 I have personally witnessed across Birmingham, West Midlands there has been persistent and continual aerial spraying throughout the year! Over the past two years this has increased massively. Other areas covered include Warwick, Leamington Spa, Coventry etc. I have watched planes create arcs, grid naughts and crosses. The planes turn and circle back over the city!! I question what is the flight destination of that aircraft if these are commercial planes! I commend all involved in this website and I am grateful for all the info everyone gas contributed.

      • Olga Raffa
        Chemtrails Project UK16th February 2014 at 7:25 pm #

        Thank you for your comment witnessing untoward aerial activities in your area and surrounding counties. It confirms public NON CONSENT to such activities and if you send the Directive to Ban Chemtrails / Weather Modification and Geoengineering perhaps a few more MP’s may have enough courage to help us. Thank you if you have already and keep sharing and encouraging friends and family to do the same.

      • Skeptic21st April 2014 at 8:40 pm #

        Did the planes you saw have airline markings? Did you try tracking the flights with any of the dozens of phone apps available to do so? The resoan I ask is because aeroplanes on landing paths circle and criss cross the skies until they have descended enough and have been allotted a landing slot. Also, did you send up anything to capture these chemicals? Small and cheap rockets are available for this job – might be worth investing if you’re that suspicious.

        • Sylvia25th October 2016 at 11:40 pm #

          Yes I agree, Skeptic. Yet unlike you I am NOT a skeptic about the chemtrails, as I have seen too many of them (S.W. UK) scribing white lines from horizon to horizon, and in criss-cross patterns, while way too high-altitude to be on holding paths for landing!
          But I do agree that actual capture of particulates from the trails themselves, backed up with as-close-to-laboratory-conditions as can be achieved (suggesting no contamination of samples) and video and witness evidence in real time, would be tremendously helpful in getting MPs to listen. Or being unable to deny it any longer when faced with a barrage of hard evidence.
          We need to prove that what is emitted from those aircraft is what we say it is, and it can be related directly to soil and terrestrial water samples.
          I am sure this can be done. Yes it will probably cost, but donations can be asked for, surely? Many would be willing to donate when given a projection of the costs.

    • mark Josepth22nd April 2014 at 12:37 pm #

      It’s definately happening 100%, I find it amazing that more people can not see it is so obvious to me, if you look at old movies from the 70’s and 80’s there are no chemtrails in the skies at all and the planes have no visible trails from their engines, look at older books and films of airports etc. The only thing that needs to be established now is the reason, I hope I am wrong but I have a really bad gut feeling that this is part of the UN and EU’s depopulation Agenda 21 in the guise of saving the planet from global warming. Go to Youtube and watch the movie endgame by Alex jones which gives a good explanation.

      • Jo28th August 2014 at 12:38 pm #

        Totally agree with you, how come after bad weather, holes of blue sky appear, gradually clear, then you see lines and feathery white clouds? Of course it’s happening, sheeple too busy looking at their damn mobiles! Planes flying night and day, when cloudy you can’t see it!!

    • Maria5th May 2014 at 7:30 am #

      I am witnessing chemtrails persistently in Winchester Hampshire. I get up in the morning at around 5.30 sometimes and the sky is fairly blue, then I see these trails that start off thin and then widen out for miles. By the afternoon the sky looks covered by very thin cloud. I am met with a certain amount of incredulity when I mention it to others as if to say “they wouldn’t do that…” but they (the government) are! What is more we are being lied to when the evidence is up there for all to see.

      • Olga Raffa
        Chemtrails Project UK21st May 2014 at 9:18 pm #

        It’s the on off activity that gives it away! We need our demands met that we lay out in the Directive to get to the bottom of the situation..so please downlaod the document, print it out and show it to others to follow the links of the iffefutable evidence that people can research for themselves. Climate manipulation is real and it needs to stop! If you can raise awareness in your community and put on a showing of ” What in the world are they spraying” Give a presentation or ask someone to help you with that and get a group of concerned people to visit your MP to help raise awareness in Parliament too! One day a vote may be needed and your MP will be all the wiser and be more inclined to make a NO vote on geoengineering and Yes vot to BAN IT! Thanks for all you do.

    • Carl F Rollberg17th February 2016 at 1:49 pm #

      I signed the petition because the air you have in the UK is poisoned by chemsprayers, and as the world rotates, so does the air. It has an effect on the entire planet. We are getting sprayed too here in the United States. They are spraying quite a lot in populated regions . We need to unite to fight it. That, by no means mean we need to join nor be taken over by a “New World Order.” If the masses are united to stop the spraying, it will be stopped. God bless my friends in the UK, Netherlands and all around the globe!

    • CHD1st November 2016 at 11:31 am #

      Rosalind Peterson addresses the UN on Chemtrails And Geoengineering

      https://youtu.be/o7g9oiyXuR8

  2. Olga Raffa
    Chemtrails Project UK1st December 2013 at 9:31 pm #

    You are welcome, we are doing our best on limited resources… so all you can do to help is vital to keep spreading the word.
    Thanks for your comment, and thanks for all you do.

  3. David Barton2nd December 2013 at 8:05 pm #

    GeoEngineering is happening in Cornwall.
    I have photo’s which document this going back a few months and it is continuing to this day.

    • Olga Raffa
      Chemtrails Project UK3rd December 2013 at 1:15 am #

      Hi David,
      thanks for letting us know you are seeing weather modification in your area. It has been noted. It is very useful to document this activity as evidence to show your MP. Perhaps do a rainwater test after a particularly heavy spray period and document your fauna and flora. If you feel your health is compromised, do hair analysis and detox if heavy metal toxicity is high. Keep up your nutritional input and keep an alkaline diet. Send a hard copy of the directive to your MP with any of your other evidence to demand a ban and an investigation of fuel emissions. For if it is all just exhaust pollution, it should be regulated, no? Keep up the good work, apply pressure and let’s get some results.

  4. Linda Saunders5th December 2013 at 4:44 pm #

    This is such a good idea – thanks for getting it organised. I recently wrote to the Department of the Environment asking what was going on, under the freedom of information act, and posed 7 questions. They came back to me on the 5th November and this is a section of the letter
    “We hold no records concerning any of your points. No geo engineering programmes including Solar Radiation Management (SRM) are being performed by HMG and, to the best of our knowledge, no geo-engineering is being performed in or above the UK. While SRM is discussed in the Royal Society report, it does not recommend implementing a programme of SRM actions, and no such programme exists.

    The trails you see in the sky are contrails from aircraft. There are fundamentally two forms of contrails: those that are persistent and those that are non persistent……..”

    it then went into a lengthy description of how these trails are formed. I even sent pictures of the skies over my house on a particularly bad Sunday. Their response was pathetic although quite scary. I’ve written to my MP anyway so it will be interesting to see what he comes back with – if enough of us do it, you never know. Great job guys.

    • Olga Raffa
      Chemtrails Project UK8th January 2014 at 1:17 pm #

      ” to the best of their knowledge” yet understand under the official secrets act if they had the knowledge they could be under oath to not reveal it. The Directive has been amended to demand elimination of this political loophole. Thanks for all you have done so far.

    • Tony Browne19th July 2014 at 10:41 pm #

      Lisa have done the above, waste of time they are all in it together

  5. Linda Saunders5th December 2013 at 4:52 pm #

    This is the response from my MP Simon Burns

    Thank you for your email.

    I have already taken this matter up on behalf of constituents and can advise that the Department for Transport is not aware of any other matter or aerosol being ejected from aircraft, other than normal exhaust products.

    I am aware that other countries have on occasions used weather modification techniques, such as cloud seeding, which causes precipitation by introducing substances into cumulus clouds that cause condensation. However, these techniques are aimed at reducing the locally damaging impacts of hail, or promoting rainfall, and have no impact on climate and should not be considered to be geo-engineering.

    It is also worth noting that since 1977, cloud seeding and environmental techniques have been subject to international regulation after countries agreed the “Convention of the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques (ENMOD). This treaty forbids the use of environmental modification techniques in hostile circumstances. For further details please see: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/221/22102.htm.

    I do hope that this information helps, and thank you again for contacting me about this important issue.

    Yours sincerely

    The Rt. Hon. Simon Burns MP
    Member of Parliament for Chelmsford

    • Olga Raffa
      Chemtrails Project UK8th January 2014 at 1:11 pm #

      Thank you for sending us your reply from The Rt. Hon. Simon Burns MP Member of Parliament for Chelmsford. We are formulating an advisory set of actions to proceed with after a response of denial is received and confirmation that no further investigation on the matter will be taken. There have been submission requests by for ” official” research to be carried out in the field, http://www.srmgi.org/call-for-submissions/ ( see pdf) therefore please bear with us for information on further action you could take to make this public push back successful. Thank you for the work you have done so far adn be encouraged we have a couple of MP’s who support us and more are considering stepping forward.

    • jeanne8th June 2014 at 1:34 pm #

      I have exactly the same letter from Simon Burns.

    • Wils21st June 2014 at 5:42 pm #

      Your response from Simon Burns MP is almost identical to the response I got from my MP Andrew Selous (Bedfordshire). So, it seems this is a template letter that all MPs are going to use to try to shut us up – I don’t think so! I however replied to that letter directing him to Chemtrailsprojectuk.com so he could see what other members of the general public around the UK were seeing and posting to the site. He replied (with links to YouTube on the subject of Chemtrails) saying that he is awaiting a response from the Aviation Minister, Robert Goodwill. Please note: Andrew Selous MP requested a recall on the email but I got there first. This should be interesting.

  6. Bryan12th December 2013 at 8:55 am #

    Thank you Chemtrails project for the great work you do. Directive has been signed by myself abd rest of my family. Also shared via social media.This has to stop it is almost every day and has been for some time… Time to end this people

    • Olga Raffa
      Chemtrails Project UK12th December 2013 at 9:14 am #

      Thank YOU Bryan, it can only happen by the actions you have taken! We are updating the Directive again already, and as the facts spread in this manner, knowledge will empower the public to be a part of the pushback to halt activities violating human rights to clean air upon which all life depends.

  7. Mr Ellis6th January 2014 at 12:49 pm #

    We should all be very very concerned that atmospheric modification/ manipulation is being carried out without supervision by representatives of the people. Past experience should have taught us all that it is pure folly to put our trust in groups who have a self interest and possibly a hidden agenda. Governments should govern for the people, with the consent of the people, and should always be and be seen to be in the best interests of the people. I have yet to be convinced that any part of this seemingly clandestine project meets my criteria for acceptable government.

  8. zeljko8th January 2014 at 8:13 am #

    Thank you for the work you do, hope it will really trigger something larger, in UK at least. I come from Croatia, town of Split and we are being sprayed like hell. I made a ton of video clips and wrote to every relevant institution in my country. I did an article on the subject which have been published, and all I have achived so far is to be mocked. Never mind, we go ahead. With the people like you, there is hope

    • Olga Raffa
      Chemtrails Project UK8th January 2014 at 12:34 pm #

      Being mocked is a good sign you are putting pressure in all the right places! We thank you for your hopeful comment, and we relay the message back to you. t is a matter of keeping going and to somehow generating more public awareness, connecting with concerned citizens and finding activists to formulate a concerted plan of action. Unfortunately it is up to people like your good self to decide to do this as the global media blackout and Govt. denial of the subject makes spreading the mere visual facts and evidence difficult. Keep going and much success to you in Croatia. Perhaps it is time to unite globally so stay connected and join the global council which some activists are putting together. And if you are on fb, here is a link to hopeful beginnings of international unity in action. https://www.facebook.com/InternationalDirectiveToBanGeoEngineering

  9. Madeleine Harman8th January 2014 at 2:42 pm #

    I want to protect my children from the chemicals they are spraying us with, please help us fight against this

  10. claire16th January 2014 at 11:16 pm #

    I emailed the petition to all of the Edinburgh Scottish parliament ministers, even those out with my constituency ( to raise awareness) last week, I also emailed my national MP Alistair Darling too. Alistair has replied to inform me he has no knowledge of this but states he will make some enquires and write to me again and be in touch as soon as he can. My regional representative in the Scottish Parliament Sarah Boyack has replied to state she has drawn my position to the attention of the Scottish Government. She will get in touch with me again once she’s had a response to her representations to the Minister for Environment and Climate Change on my behalf Could i get an email address where i should forward my replies please

  11. claire17th January 2014 at 12:43 am #

    FYI everyone another really good thing we can all obtain in evidence to support that this reality, is happening, is our local medical health stats! We can/ should make some freedom of information requests to our local hospitals/ health boards to find out statistics over the last 10 years of A) Emergency admissions due to breathing difficulties, B) The rates of Alzheimer’s, C) Aneurysm rates D) Strokes rates, E) Heart Attacks rates F) Cancer rates. Obviously not all of these are due to Chemtrails but there is a strong correlation that in highly sprayed areas i truly believe will be hard to deny. Medical stats + rain water stats + photos and video footage = it being harder and harder to deny and bluff there way through!!! We are no longer brainwashable!! Power to the people!!!!

  12. web design23rd January 2014 at 7:34 pm #

    What’s up, all the time i used to check website posts here early in the dawn,
    because i like to learn more and more.

  13. rina manek29th January 2014 at 5:03 pm #

    You see them chemtrailing day in day out. Only last friday on a flight from Spain to Gatwick, I saw the planes doing it. Just past Bilbao the clouds thickened and over the sea towards the southern part of the UK.
    It’s time to get a global protest march started with a petition. We all want to see blue skies again.
    The government will try to deny this fact but there is so much proof we can stand united and put an end to being sprayed with chemicals.
    Keep me posted. Thanks

  14. Alex30th January 2014 at 2:09 pm #

    Hi, I love your enthusiasm to protect our environment. I really, really hope we can get some solid evidence and facts soon as there has been no provable evidence yet. I like to think I can trust my eyes and that things don’t look like they used to, but the sad fact is we have no evidence yet, I see none on this page that cannot be explained rationally.

  15. Evies2nd February 2014 at 1:47 pm #

    Hi there CPUK – I sent the Directive along with a cover note from here to my MP Anas Sarwar for Glasgow Central. He himself did not read it, but his assistant i’m sure was tasked with the ( job) of fobbing off! I did intend to email Mr Sarwars’ assistant & still do ( i was laid a little low with Flu ..) as his reply to me was at best insulting! Here is the note, i sent with Directive; “** I would greatly appreciate if you would give this matter your utmost attention. As an extremely concerned citizen, i have witnessed first hand the daily spraying of our skies, and have documented via photographs etc… at least two years of spraying, in the skies here. I sincerely hope that you will take this matter very, very seriously, and hope that i receive a speedy reply. many thanks”**. And here is the reply i received from Mr Sarwars’ assistant – “*** Anas Sarwar MP has asked me to thank you for your email below.

    Mr Sarwar shares your concerns regarding the impact that geo-engineering could potentially have on our country and indeed the rest of the world.

    However, he was reassured somewhat by the position taken by the previous Labour Government and the current Coalition Government, both of whom have stressed that the first priority is to tackle human causes of climate change at source by reducing emissions of greenhouse gases and pushing for strong international action to achieve this goal. They have also stressed the need for a considerable amount of new research to be done, before geo-engineering is used in our country.

    Thank you once again for writing to Mr Sarwar and sharing your views.

    Yours sincerely,

    Yassar Abbas
    Office of Anas Sarwar MP
    Deputy Leader of the Scottish Labour Party
    Member of Parliament for Glasgow Central

    Rm 221-223 Portcullis,
    House of Commons,
    Westminster,
    London,
    SW1A 0AA.

    Tel: 020 7219 7076
    Email: [email protected]

    • Olga Raffa
      Chemtrails Project UK11th February 2014 at 11:54 pm #

      Thank you for sending us your MP’s response. We have logged this now on the status page and will contact you about your reply to keep your MP engaged on the issue of the necessity to ban geoengineering.

  16. Kacey6th February 2014 at 10:27 pm #

    The Government agrees that the current definition of geoengineering
    encompasses a broad range of technologies and techniques, and confirms that
    methods of weather modification (such as cloud seeding) that achieve local
    (within national boundary) effects of a transient nature, are not included in our
    definition of geoengineering.
    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/83821/EIR_13-0107_cloud_seeding.pdf

    • Olga Raffa
      Chemtrails Project UK11th February 2014 at 11:32 pm #

      Indeed, we mention this in The Directive and subtitle it “A public demand to ban stratospheric aerosol geoengineering, weather modification, cloud seeding and the deliberate aerial spraying of chemical aerosols.”

  17. Martin Sullivan20th February 2014 at 1:25 am #

    Not really sure if the mail to my local MP sent ok… clicked the send button and after waiting for this website, then the letter part I wrote disappears but the chemtrailsprojectuk.com quotes stay?

    • Olga Raffa
      Chemtrails Project UK20th February 2014 at 1:57 am #

      Thanks for alerting us to this fact. We did not receive notification that you’ve sent it yet, so there could be a significant problem… Will look into it right away. Will get back to you.

  18. "Oz"1st April 2014 at 8:39 am #

    Hello friends, we are living in some amazing times! We have stumbled on this powerful set of individual news stories concerning…. > “FAKE+SNOW+FALLS+USA+2014” @ http://www.kctvmedia.com – You will see that – SNOW DOESN’T MELT PROPERLY?”and why this is so… Make sure you watch this…. “Watch Whistleblower Share Her Story Now!” clip ! We will be filming further data which can be FREELY accessed @ http://www.youtube.com/kctvmedia . Watch “H.A.A.R.P IN WALES…” — So make sure you click on the “Youtube” clip…… Then click on the “Show more” button… to open up – Further Wisdom & Historical Revelation for this TIME! Information ALMOST LOST from view !!! Enjoy…… Shalom “Oz” http://www.kctvmedia.com

  19. Rachel6th April 2014 at 8:17 pm #

    Please can u stop the chemtrails , they are spraying our skies daily an this is real an happening , maybe u could find out more about it too , please help us the people to have a voice an be heard , what they are doing is so wrong , geo engineering is a real threat to our environment an it’s real, look up, where are out blue skies ?? I hope u do try an stop this , kind regards a very worried local :/

    • Olga Raffa
      Chemtrails Project UK15th April 2014 at 4:17 pm #

      It is up to every person who knows about chemtrails to share the information that mainstream media is not giving the general public. You are who you have been waiting for. Please take responsibility and do your part.

  20. ambit9th April 2014 at 9:08 pm #

    Pretty! This was a really wonderful article. Thanks for supplying these
    details.

  21. michael clayton13th April 2014 at 9:59 am #

    Please stop these freaks spraying our skies in.sick experiments poisoning our are.and.killing all.wildlife

    • Olga Raffa
      Chemtrails Project UK15th April 2014 at 4:23 pm #

      Please also do all you can sharing the information and raising awareness. We all have to take initiative to do something in our communities else word will only stay with those who know..

    • Olga Raffa
      Chemtrails Project UK19th April 2014 at 8:54 am #

      we are doing our best under limited resources and time, yet please do not rely on us! Every one who is aware needs to be doing something to get the information out there.

  22. Skeptic21st April 2014 at 8:52 pm #

    Very skeptical about your global warming claims. It seems like much of this site is anti-global warming science. You ought to correct your against AGW section. • Firstly: “Despite us putting more CO2 into the atmosphere, there has been no measured global increase in temperatures for 17 years. [6]” – yet the graph clearly shows a consistent increase in temperatures (taking a small section is not the proper way to look at that data. If you did that at many points during the timescale you would see temperatures declining. But if you draw a line from the start to the finish, you see a warming trend that is consistent.

    • The amount of Arctic and Antarctic ice is increasing not decreasing. [7] – This doesn’t actually refute AGW. It’s known that the ice, particularly in the centre of Antarctica is getting thicker. What’s of concern is the amount that’s being lost at the edges, and from glaciers, And how much the coastline is retreating.

    • Olga Raffa
      Chemtrails Project UK21st May 2014 at 9:35 pm #

      Millions is being spent to confuse us about global warming. Weather extreems are being exacerbated by geoengineering. \a good resource to find information about this issue is avaialble at : http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/?s=global+warming

    • Mike31st July 2014 at 2:10 pm #

      The entire global warming section is full of misinformation. Anthropogenic global warming is accepted by the vast majority of genuine experts. The opposition to the idea mainly comes not from the scientific community, but from free-market think-tanks and the right-wing media. Of course political lobby groups often pay scientists to speak out in favour of their “sceptical” view of AGW (although, tellingly, they’re not usually climate experts), but then this is not surprising: the tobacco companies used similar tactics in a sustained effort to avoid regulation of their dangerous product. The site also mentions the “Oregon Petition” (30,000 “scientists” who oppose the idea of anthropogenic climate change), but they fail to mention that anyone with just a BSc can sign the petition (a BSc is not an expert on any specialist area of science), and that very few of the doctorate signatures can actually be verified, and are likely in fact fake. Although considering the whole chemtrails idea is a load of nonsense, on the same level as 9/11 and moon-landing conspiracy theories, it is not surprising that an unwavering commitment to the truth is not part of this website’s agenda.

      • CPUK15th August 2014 at 9:47 am #

        Over 9,000 with PhDs. Care to comment on the calibre of the ‘scientists’ that advise the IPCC?

        And for anyone that isn’t up on 9/11, here is a 5-minute summary of the official story – the ultimate conspiracy theory.

  23. Carl21st April 2014 at 9:39 pm #

    I want to see a list of countries by name, that prohibit chem trailing VS countries that allow it. I dont want a phony UN announcement condeming the action of chem trailing in the generic. We want facts. We want to know about the depth of this atrocity world wide. Can’t depend on the U.S. either for information. Their “jounalism” means “sensationalism and lies for profit”.

    • Olga Raffa
      Chemtrails Project UK21st May 2014 at 9:30 pm #

      The ENMOD treaty prohibits weather manipulation but allows it for peacful purposes. We believe this is happening under this loophole.

  24. Barry Martin28th April 2014 at 12:41 pm #

    Please cease all spraying. I do not know of anyone who asked for it, or who would possibly want it. Stop now.

  25. Ian29th April 2014 at 7:49 pm #

    We can see them, they are real and not fictitious. Who is it that has the power to authorise such dangerous activities without due process? If it is one of our political leaders they should be charged with crimes against humanity.

  26. zone1st May 2014 at 4:22 am #

    Thanks for finally talking about >Directive to Ban Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering and Aerial Aerosol Spraying in the United
    Kingdom (21-Dec-2013) – Chemtrails Project UK <Loved it!

  27. Missy8th June 2014 at 9:24 pm #

    Would the jets be travelling vertically and at high altitudes?
    I suspect I may have seen two jets in the West Sussex area Friday 6th June.
    Thanks for the wealth of information on this great site.

  28. Barbara Skingle10th July 2014 at 9:03 am #

    Perhaps we could all begin bearing witness to these chemtrails by putting up a site and then posting photos and location of the event and slowly build up a map of events to visually show what is happening in the UK. We all need to really look up and see what is happening over our heads , rather than keep our heads down and pretend it isn’t happening ….

  29. Linda15th July 2014 at 10:04 am #

    Northern Ireland….. Just watched 2 planes in the sky – 1 left a chemtrail and 1 left a contrail. How do I know? Because 1 trail disappeared within seconds and the other stayed. When I left home this morning I noted how beautiful the weather was, with a clear blue sky, and within minutes of the chemtrail, the sky is now covered with dark clouds. Coincidence? Unfortunately, I fear not.

  30. Luke18th July 2014 at 2:52 pm #

    This may sound stupid but are we not able to protect ourselves from this? For example I haven’t agreed to be in any experiment and to be poisoned and in some way these people are assaulting me and harming me. so be it far fetched maybe but if we were aware of where these planes took off and landed would it be a crime for me to prevent them from taking off again to protect myself?.

  31. Tony Browne19th July 2014 at 10:52 pm #

    Have tried MP’S newspapers, police and even told a fire crew the other day, the chemicals are Strontium, Barium AND Aluminium amongst others and attack the brain, lungs and heart. There is a current petition by Avaaz.org with over 19,300 hits so far on Chemtrails. Target companies with lots of staff to get the message out.

  32. The Lama23rd October 2014 at 4:40 pm #

    You will find them in the skies of Crystal Palace, West Norwood (South London) and all surrounding areas. Taken a few pics. Initially, like many people, I just thought they were commercial planes. *sigh* I will forward to my MP. Thanks

  33. Ingrid Dickenson24th October 2014 at 1:37 pm #

    I just wrote a lengthy letter to my MP Stephen Hammond on your site, asking him for an answer to my query regarding the levels of toxic substances in my rainwater test as he previously stated that no such spraying takes place over the UK because he asked `London Transport’. After I wrote the letter I tried to review it and it disappeared. Can you tell me if it went off, otherwise I have to write again.

  34. Wayne29th October 2014 at 6:58 am #

    I just received a reply from my MP who wrote on my behalf to house of parliament which goes as follows i forward some of the details….”Quote” No SRM, which could include spraying to reflect sunlight or modifying clouds, is currently being performed by HMG and. to the best of our knowledge, is not being performed in or above the UK,while SRM is discussed in the royal society report,it does not recommend implementing a programme of SRM,and no such programme exists……….After reading through the letter more thoroughly i noticed a small mistake which makes me believe that this letter has been MASS produced and the government are lying “Quote” and this is currently being negotiated at EU level which a decision is expected in APRIL 2014……..As of typing this it is now Oct 29 2014 and i received my letter 3 DAYS AGO !the letter basically tries to insult my intelligence and that of others too by claiming what we are indeed witnessing are CONTRAILS and the letter goes on to explain the science behind CONTRAILS, I KNOW WHAT “CONDENSATION TRAILS” look like and HOW they are made, what we are witnessing ARE NOT contrails,dont be fooled people, take action, force your MP to wake up and take action

  35. Paul szuster30th October 2014 at 1:20 am #

    I have just witnessed 5 planes flying from north to south over workington in Cumbria, 3 of which began to release the chem trails in front of my scheptical eyes. They passed over a half hour period and released in lines at different altitudes. Had I not witnessed 2 other planes with the usual normal con trails passing in the same direction I would have thought nothing of it. I was not aware of chem trails before today but am fully convinced now and would like to do something to stop it. I will write to our MP but was also thinking of local media along the lines of an appeal for further investigation carried out by U.S, the general public, checking our skies and documenting / photographing sightings for collation by a central group. I’m led to believe that we now have the technology to track all commercial flights so cross checking flight paths to produce solid evidence shouldn’t be that difficult. I also read about a suggestion of sampling the vapor…. I will be encouraging my children to be raising this issue at school for projects etc and see what they come up with, but if I was threatening or rather informing the government of my intent, (so as not to be arrested as a terrorist, sellafield is not far from my house) to be blasting rockets up in attempts to sample the vapor I believe that might raise some attention??? Has anybody else tried this?? Any suggestions for what people should be recording when looking at the planes? Is this scheme already running? Basically I’m new to this and want to help so all suggestions / comments will be gratefully considered…

    • Steve H18th April 2015 at 6:24 pm #

      Excellent work folks, i have been following the chemtrail agenda for many years now. I have taken over 1,000 photo’s and have a video of a selection of them on youtube here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwp_EATD-HU&feature=youtu.be i have written numerous articles on how they work what they do and why. While some folks may not agree with me on specifics of the agenda at least i am sure we can all agree that it is a very real phenomenon and that raising awareness of this subject is extremely important. Blessings and peace folks

  36. Ireneusz2nd December 2014 at 1:00 am #

    Hi, Please research on orgone energy and Cloud/chem busters. Please search for Wilhelm Reich. I have built now 2 cloudbusters but recens spreing is so heavy that they can’t get through this crap :/ You can even put any metal pipes in to the bucket with water and leave it in back garden. It will still help a bit. Good luck!

  37. margaret cain19th December 2014 at 3:18 pm #

    HI everyone who is concerned about these chemtrails need to send an e mail to there member of parliament in there area, I sent an e mail to mine and received a letter back today,He has sent a letter to the Transport Secretary expressing my concerns about chemtrails, and as soon has he has received a response he will get back to me .

  38. Ian Wightman21st December 2014 at 8:59 pm #

    When will the sheeple finally wake up ?. it is beyond belief that there are still people out there who are totally oblivious to what’s around them, in the skies chemtrails, in our food genetically modified products, in the water fluoride, in the vaccines poisons & cancer causing agents, in the press government lies & propaganda, WAKE UP SHEEPLE

  39. Ian Wightman21st December 2014 at 9:14 pm #

    I admire people for attempting to get their MPs involved unfortunately MPs along with presidents & rulers are merely puppets to the corporations like Monsanto, Murdoch media, Beilderberg etc. Just read what the Trans Atlantic Trade Agreement is about & perhaps after reading it you may wake up to reality. Over the next few years our benevolent government “whichever of the political side” will oversee the introduction of smart meters in our homes “for those who don,t already have them” check out some of the websites & see what they are actually about. The next time you think about getting the flu vaccine or your children read about what they actually contain & what they can do to you & your children & when you next run your tap for a glass of that nice pure drinking water read about the fluoride that is pumped into your water supply. TIME TO WAKE UP SHEEPLE.

  40. Robert18th January 2015 at 10:38 am #

    Breathing metal nano particles can not be good for the health of people. I live in America I have seen spraying even in the deserts of Texas , Just hope that less harmful stuff can be put to use for weather modification.

  41. Lorenzo5th March 2015 at 12:53 pm #

    Hi everybody, I’m an italian guy who is living in London from pair years and I could see an intense activity of geoengineering here .It’s long time I am interesting at this “fenomena” and I can confirm that also in Italy, where I come back often,there is an intense activity: Rome,Florence, London so UK, Italy, France, USA … chemtrails involve all the world, but people are too busy with their head down to the mobile instead that looking up! (sorry for my english

  42. Marc12th April 2015 at 8:30 pm #

    They should be STOPPED,today was the worst ive seen it,the sky was like a chess board. Its not right them messing with the air we breathe!!!

  43. Dave Owen18th April 2015 at 8:37 pm #

    Hi, fellow concerned readers. Over a period of 5 years I have noticed the time period from spraying to clouds forming, has come from 3 days to just 10 hours. Its my belief that they have nano sized the particles of spray materials, so it can be used with ordinary aircraft fuel, in its own tank. Remember the lead we once had in car fuel. If they can put lead in fuel they can do other materials. Keep telling people to look up, it takes a while to convince about the spraying idea. Keep mentioning the effects, then they twig on.

  44. Trevor21st May 2015 at 12:46 pm #

    Watch the film ‘They Live’ (1988). Tip: the ugly aliens represent the psychopathic élite and their minions who do the spraying. Normal human activities do not raise the temperature of the earth. Artificial global chemtrails, over decades, block the sun and cool it.

    World population limit 500 million:
    http://www.radioliberty.com/stones.htm

    Prince Philip: “I wish to reincarnate as a killer virus to reduce world population.”
    http://www.propagandamatrix.com/prince.html

  45. berian bucknell6th August 2015 at 8:07 am #

    hi they spray up in the skys, but there is another method i have seen, this looks like a clouds like a feathery ,its sent by the gulf stream, Im just a person that watches the sky, and the evil thats on this wonderful Yahweh made earth, blessings to you all brian

  46. Lamin29th September 2015 at 8:11 am #

    Here in the southeast we had a few days of crystal clear skys. The humidity levels and temperature where slightly higher than usual for an October (we’re supposed to be having an Indian summer at the moment). We’ve also just witnessed a Supermoon eclipse so there’s been plenty of attention aimed towards the sky. But as of today the spraying has started up again, this morning the sky was crisscrossed with the familiar patterns with electric blue patches of sky where the spraying had not spread (yet), so there was a clear distinction. The temperature and humidity levels have not deviated much from previous days and planes where literally side by side with some laying down chemtrails and others displaying the appropriate contrail mechanics. This is now a BLATANT act that has no clear perpetrator, plenty of background and the dangers to public and environmental systems remain completely unknown.

  47. Mark Dixon4th December 2015 at 12:21 pm #

    Hi thank you chemtrail uk and everyone supporting it , I thought I was alone but have now found others who can actually see and care enough to research and stop what they are doingvtovus and our family’s, its a sad day when reality is a horror story , keep up the fight everyone never surrender ever ✊

  48. Mark Dixon4th December 2015 at 12:45 pm #

    Forgot to mention location I’m in ongar esssex , seeing same as all reports made only harrp can be seen here ive got photos and its clear that it is harrp, beng used in conjuction whith chemtrails,

  49. Nigel10th December 2015 at 5:14 pm #

    I’ve been aware of the geoengineering taking place in Lancashire for some years but recent events compelled me to take action.
    As a new proud father I gave a little smile when I walked past an infants school and heard them at play.
    Then I looked up to see a clear blue sky streaked with the common noxious site of chem trails.
    I took a video and contacted my mp.

    Mr Maynard,

    I am a very concerned Cleveleys resident and feel compelled to contact you about the outrages, illegal and highly toxic activities being carried out on the Fylde coast.
    If there is a chance you are unaware of which I speak please check the pdf.
    I am collecting video evidence and rainwater to proof my concern.
    I will also be starting a campaign in the local area to raise awareness and it would be nice to have your feedback and support.

    I plan to take action.
    We all should be mad !

    • James Hodgskiss
      James Hodgskiss10th December 2015 at 9:51 pm #

      Hiya Nigel,

      Great to hear you are taking action. Do post back as to how you get on.

      Was the pdf you sent your MP the Directive?

      Cheers,
      James

      • Nigel12th December 2015 at 12:17 am #

        Hi James,

        I’ve downloaded the pdf at the top of this page and attached it to the e-mail.
        I plan to hand out leaflets in the high street and perhaps post some door to door in the new year. Awareness seems to be the first issue to address. I understand the scale of these activities but if just one council takes action we’d get a foot in the door.
        One battle in a long war I feel.

        I’ll be in touch.
        Thanks,
        Nigel

  50. Ali akhter3rd January 2016 at 5:08 pm #

    We all need to make a stand and have a mass protest to bring it to the attention of the public on a massive scale. We all need to act NOW. If any one is interested in getting this sorted please comment on here and we can all get our heads together

  51. Nigel Bates12th January 2016 at 1:46 pm #

    UPDATE (in full).
    I received this letter from my local MP on the Fylde coast after I contacted him with my concerns regarding geoengineering in my area.

    Dear Mr Bates

    Thank you for your email about atmospheric geoengineering.

    In the UK, the department of Transport is not aware of any matter or aerosol being ejected from aircraft, other than normal exhaust fumes. As I understand it, the airplane trails you can see in the sky are caused by hot exhaust fumes meeting very cold high-altitude air.

    I am aware that other countries have on occasions used weather modifications techniques, such as cloud seeding, which causes precipitation by releasing substances into cumulus clouds that cause condensation. However, these techniques are aimed at reducing the locally damaging impacts of hail, or promoting rainfall, and have no impact on the weather in the medium term. Therefore they should not be considered to be “geo-engineering”, and in any case have never been used in Britain.

    It is also worth noting that since 1977, cloud seeding and environmental techniques have been subject to international regulation after countries agreed the “Convention of the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques” (ENMOD). This treaty forbids the use of environmental modification techniques against other countries or in war.

    For further details, please see the 5th Report of Science and Technology Committee on the subject:
    http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/221/22102.htm.

    Any thoughts or suggestions on my next step?

    Nigel

  52. Peter Jameson29th January 2016 at 7:50 am #

    This is poisoning the planet

  53. David2nd February 2016 at 9:58 pm #

    Only a fool believes that the chem-trails are non toxic, and normal exhaust fumes and water crystals dissipate after a short period of time, as the water vapour/ exhaust gases cools down to the ambient temperature of the aircraft flight path altitude this is what I believe to be true, this is called a con trail or con-trail.

    But the amount of information obtained from people to be the true facts differs from the fact which we are being told, I could understand if the spraying was not so wide spreed but it is far worse than we think because of it is now on a global scale,

    It is bad enough knowing that the amount of pollution is killing us with ref:
    There’s a new fear of flying: You’re more likely to die from exposure to toxic pollutants in plane exhaust than in a plane crash, a new study suggests.
    sourse. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/10/101005-planes-pollution-deaths-science-environment/

    From an airline mechanic:

    “For reasons you will understand as you read this I can not divulge my identity. I am an aircraft mechanic for a major airline. I work at one of our maintenance bases located at a large airport. I have discovered some information that I think you will find important.

    First I should tell you something about the “pecking order” among mechanics. It is important to my story and to the cause to which you have dedicated yourself.

    Mechanics want to work on three things. The avionics, the engines, or the flight controls. The mechanics that work on these systems are considered at the top of the “pecking order”. Next come the mechanics that work on the hydraulics and air conditioning systems. Then come the ones who work on the galley and other non-essential systems. But at the very bottom of the list are the mechanics that work on the waste disposal systems. No mechanic wants to work on the pumps, tanks, and pipes that are used to store the waste from the lavatories.

    But at every airport where I have worked there are always 2 or 3 mechanics that volunteer to work on the lavatory systems. The other mechanics are happy to let them do it. Because of this you will have only 2 or 3 mechanics that work on these systems at any one airport. No one pays much attention to these guys and no mechanic socializes with another mechanic who only works on the waste systems. In fact I had never thought much about this situation until last month.

    Like most airlines we have reciprocal agreements with the other airlines that fly into this airport. If they have a problem with a plane one of our mechanics will take care of it. Likewise if one of our planes has a problem at an airport where the other airline has a maintenance base, they will fix our plane.

    One day last month I was called out from our base to work on a plane for another airline. When I got the call the dispatcher did not know what the problem was. When I got to the plane I found out that the problem was in waste disposal system. There was nothing for me to do but to crawl in and fix the problem. When I got into the bay I realized that something was not right. There were more tanks, pumps, and pipes then should have been there. At first I assumed that the system had been changed. It had been 10 years since I had worked on one. As I tried to find the problem I quickly realized the extra piping and tanks were not connected to the waste disposal system. I had just discovered this when another mechanic from my company showed up. It was one of the mechanics who usually works on these systems. I happily turned the job over to him. As I was leaving I asked him about the extra equipment. He told me to “worry about my end of the plane and let him worry about his!”

    The next day I was on the company computer to look up a wiring schematic. While I was there I decided to look up the extra equipment I had found. To my amazement the manuals did not show any of the extra equipment I had seen with my own eyes the day before. I even tied in to the manufacturer files and still found nothing. Now I was really determined to find out what that equipment did.

    The next week we had three of our planes in our main hanger for periodic inspection. There are mechanics crawling all over a plane during these inspections. I had just finished my shift and I decided to have a look at the waste system on one of our planes. With all the mechanics around I figured that no one would notice an extra one on the plane. Sure enough, the plane I choose had the extra equipment!

    I began to trace the system of pipes, pumps, and tanks. I found what appeared to be the control unit for the system. It was a standard looking avionics control box but it had no markings of any kind. I could trace the control wires from the box to the pumps and valves but there were no control circuits coming into the unit. The only wires coming into the unit was a power connection to the aircraft’s main power bus.

    The system had 1 large and 2 smaller tanks. It was hard to tell in the cramped compartment but it looked like the large tank could hold 50 gallons. The tanks were connected to a fill and drain valve that passed through the fuselage just behind the drain valve for the waste system. When I had a chance to look for this connection under the plane I found it cunningly hidden behind a panel under the panel used to access the waste drain.

    I began to trace the piping from the pumps. These pipes lead to a network of small pipes that ended in the trailing edges of the wings and horizontal stabilizers. If you look closely at the wings of a large airplane you will see a set of wires, about the size of your finger, extending from the trailing edge of the wing surfaces. These are the static discharge wicks. They are used to dissipate the static electric charge that builds up on a plane in flight. I discovered that the pipes from this mystery system lead to every 1 out of 3 of these static discharge wicks. These wicks had been “hollowed out” to allow whatever flows through these pipes to be discharged through these fake wicks.

    It was while I was on the wing that one of the managers spotted me. He ordered me out of the hanger telling me that my shift was over and I had not been authorized any overtime.

    The next couple of days were very busy and I had no time to continue my investigation. Late one afternoon, two days after my discovery, I was called to replace an engine temperature sensor on a plane due to take off in two hours. I finished the job and turned in the paperwork.

    About 30 minutes later I was paged to see the General Manager. When I went in his office I found that our union rep and two others who I did not know were waiting on me. He told me that a serious problem had been discovered. He said that I was being written up and suspended for turning in false paperwork. He handed me a disciplinary form stating that I had turned in false paperwork on the engine temperature sensor I had installed a few hours before. I was floored and began to protest. I told them that this was ridiculous and that I had done this work. The union rep spoke up then and recommended that we take a look at the plane and see if we could straighten it all out. It was at this time that I asked who the other two men were. The GM told me that they were airline safety inspectors but would not give me their names.

    We proceeded to the plane, which should have been in the air but was parked on our maintenance ramp. We opened the engine cowling and the union rep pulled the sensor. He checked the serial number and told everyone that it was the old instrument. We then went to the parts bay and went back into the racks. The union rep checked my report and pulled from the rack a sealed box. He opened the box and pulled out the engine temperature sensor with the serial number of the one I had installed. I was told that I was suspended for a week without pay and to leave immediately.

    I sat at home the first day of my suspension wondering what the hell had happened to me. That evening I received a phone call. The voice told me “Now you know what happens to mechanics who poke around in things they shouldn’t. The next time you start working on systems that are no concern of yours you will lose your job. As it is I’m feeling generous, I believe that you’ll be able to go back to work soon” CLICK. Again I had to pick myself from off the floor. I made the connection that what had happened was directly connected to my tracing the mysterious piping. The next morning the General Manager called me. He said that due to my past excellent employment record that the suspension had been reduced to one day and that I should report back to work immediately. The only thing I could think of was what are they trying to hide and who are THEY!

    That day at work went by as if nothing had happened. None of the other mechanics mentioned the suspension and my union rep told me not to talk about it. That night I logged onto the Internet to try to find some answers. I don’t remember now how I got there but I came across your site. That’s when it all came together. But the next morning at work I found a note inside my locked locker. It said, “Curiosity killed the cat. Don’t be looking at Internet sites that are no concern of yours.”

    Well that’s it. THEY are watching me.

    Well you already know what they are doing. I don’t know what they are spraying but I can tell you how they are doing it. I figure they are using the “honey trucks”. These are the trucks that empty the waste from the lavatory waste tanks. The airports usually contract out this job and nobody goes near these trucks. Who wants to stand next a truck full of sh–. While these guys are emptying the waste tanks they are filling the tanks of the spray system. They know the planes flight path so they probably program the control unit to start spraying some amount of time after the plane reaches a certain altitude. The spray nozzles in the fake static wicks are so small that no one in the plane would see a thing.

    God help us all,
    A concerned citizen.”

    Another one speaks out:

    An Airline Manager’s Statement … 5-22-00

    “I read the email you received from the anonymous mechanic and felt compelled to respond to it. I, too, work for an airline, though I work in upper management levels. I will not say which airline, what city I am located, nor what office I work for, for obvious reasons. I wish I could document everything I am about to relate to you, but to do so is next to impossible and would result in possible physical harm to me.

    Airline companies in America have been participating in something called Project Cloverleaf for a few years now. The earliest date anyone remembers being briefed on it is 1998. I was briefed on it in 1999. The few airline employees who were briefed on Project Cloverleaf were all made to undergo background checks, and before we were briefed on it we were made to sign non-disclosure agreements, which basically state that if we tell anyone what we know we could be imprisoned.

    About twenty employees in our office were briefed along with me by two officials from some government agency. They didn’t tell us which one. They told us that the government was going to pay our airline, along with others, to release special chemicals from commercial aircraft. When asked what the chemicals were and why we were going to spray them, they told us that information was given on a need-to-know basis and we weren’t cleared for it. They then went on to state that the chemicals were harmless, but the program was of such importance that it needed to be done at all costs. When we asked them why didn’t they just rig military aircraft to spray these chemicals, they stated that there weren’t enough military aircraft available to release chemicals on such a large basis as needs to be done. That’s why Project Cloverleaf was initiated, to allow commercial airlines to assist in releasing these chemicals into the atmosphere. Then someone asked why all the secrecy was needed. The government reps then stated that if the general public knew that the aircraft they were flying on were releasing chemicals into the air, environmentalist groups would raise hell and demand the spraying stop. Someone asked one of the G-men then if the chemicals are harmless, why not tell the public what the chemicals are and why we are spraying them? He seemed perturbed at this question and told us in a tone of authority that the public doesn’t need to know what’s going on, but that this program is in their best interests. He also stated that we should not tell anyone, nor ask any more questions about it. With that, the briefing was over.

    All documents in our office pertaining to Project Cloverleaf are kept in locked safes. Nobody is allowed to take these documents out of the office. Very few employees are allowed access to these documents, and they remain tight-lipped about what the documents say.

    I am no fool. I know there’s something going on. And frankly, I am scared. I feel a high level of guilt that I have been aware of this kind of operation but unable to tell anyone. It’s been eating away at me, knowing that the company I work for may be poisoning the American people. I hope this letter will open some eyes to what’s happening.

    Again, I wish I could give you documented information, but you have to understand why I must remain totally anonymous

    Please go to
    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/10/101005-planes-pollution-deaths-science-environment/

  54. flyingandy1st April 2016 at 3:10 pm #

    I was a private pilot for 10 years from 1998 to 2008 and flew over most of the UK airspace and channel islands, also mainland Europe. As with all pilots I was trained and examined in aviation meteorology and learned to understand weather patterns, cloud structure and formation and other weather related phenomenon to do with all types of flying conditions.
    Without doubt the present and ongoing changes to the appearance of our skies, and the unusual structures and mixtures of cloud types are NOT normal! Air traffic controllers have to ensure safe and adequate distances of separation of all types of aircraft, and if two aircraft are found to fly in too close a proximity or on reciprocal headings then an “airprox” is reported to the CAA. How then can an apparently large number of high flying commercial aircraft succeed in safely flying at distances which seem inadequate for safe separation and in flight paths which cross, run closely parallel and discharge some form of trail which may be many kilometres long, remain in the air for prolonged periods of time (even when normal clouds are moving with air currents) and which gradually widen out and merge over vast areas of sky – unless there is some form of commercial “formation flying” akin to the red arrows or for specific and unknown purpose?
    Whatever these trails are and whatever they are called, they are NOT normal contrails and must therefore be something else. Despite writing to my local and Euro MP expressing my concerns that there may or may not be a harmful aspect or purpose to these manouvres, and asking him to look into them (he is all said and done exposed with his family to them as well!), the reply I received was courteous yet basically patronising and explained absolutely nothing.
    I believe, as do more and more people that a full and clear disclosure and explanation of these “chemtrails” must be given publicly to everyone and that this should be done now. After all if this is all for the public good then we ought to know about it so we can properly thank those acting in our best interests, shouldn’t we??

  55. john20th April 2016 at 11:16 am #

    we are fighting a tough fight but we are the majority and will be heard regardless of the continual denial, and debunking, total awareness to all is needed , before we can deal with halfwitted powers that be whom obviously are filling there pockets at the cost of all humanity and the over all health of our world, it has to stop asap let us not give up and continually bombard them as they are doing to us until we make a change.

  56. Mac27th April 2016 at 1:36 pm #

    Up until today I wasn’t aware of this website or the campaign . I’d stumbled across conspiracy theories about Contrail/Chemtrails in North America, on the internet, but hadn’t paid much attention and put it down to a few localised experiments in America to manipulate the weather.

    On the evening of Tuesday 19th April 2016 I was walking to my local pub to watch the live broadcast of the Premiership Football game between Newcastle United and Manchester City. Approx four hundred yards from the venue I happened to look up and saw in amazement, above the roof tops, three, possibly four aircraft, at very high altitude, flying very quickly and carrying out maneauveres that were very unusual. The continuous contrails clearly traced the flight paths of these planes. The pattern they left consisted of parallel lines followed by tight one hundred eighty degree turns forming a tight snake like continuous pattern right across the sky to the East. This would put the location of this activity directly east of Tynemouth, North East England and directly above the North Sea.

    After a further few hundred yards of walking, these Contrials had expanded quite quickly and were beggining to spread out and join with the expanding Contrails running parallel to them. Effectively shrouding the blue sky with a white haze. By the time I’d reached the venue, lower cloud had quickly moved across the sky and started to obscure the activity. I entered the venue and put it to the back of my mind.

    Fast forward another week to Tuesday 26th April and out of my house window I looked to the East and a little farther South from the previous weeks activity, I saw the same contrail pattern. This time I had my digital camera at hand and I took photos.

    This latest episode encouraged me to do some research and here I am recounting my experience. This is the first time I’ve ever noticed this kind of activity before and in my mind is certainly not normal activity. As a foot note to theses observations, I’m familiar with the flight paths to my local Airport (Newcastle) and other flight paths that go to Scotland and beyond. I use the Plane Finder App in my IPhone occasionally to track flights. Contrails from these regular flights seem to dissipate quickly and are often punctuated with gaps. The contrails I observed on both occasions, purposefully put there by this unusual flight pattern, spread out to form a blanket of thin cloud, as if designed to do so!

    After reading a few comments on this website I shall remember to use my Plane Finder App if I witness this unusual activity again.

  57. paula scally5th May 2016 at 3:03 pm #

    ive got severe memory problems and im only 54 plus i have a form of autism ,also depression and paranoia,also bouts of psychicness wich frighten me.its all down to a mixture of all the experiments they have been doing on us since the 40s.thats why theres a lot of crazy people in mental health hospitals and prisons and a lot of people killing themselves.thats what they want.survival of the fittest that are left will produce immune offspring eventually

  58. paula scally5th May 2016 at 3:07 pm #

    i suffer from severe memory loss depression,anxiety and autism im 54 my daughter also has aspergers and adhd and so do my granchildren there is def sommthing going on and i thinkits a mixture of all the experiments theyve done on us.chem trails crop spraying,immunisations,food addatives,firing rockets into the sun to creative solar glares and numerous other things theyve done that we havent even found out about yet.c

  59. paula scally5th May 2016 at 3:10 pm #

    stop experimenting on us.its caused autism in my family me also im 54 and my daughter and grankids i also have mental problems and memory problems

  60. stephen spencely5th May 2016 at 5:53 pm #

    this is proven to be a danger to all life on the planet .and they have not done any research into the dangers of breathing this in,dr david kieth openly admits to doing no research,

  61. Connie Drummond5th May 2016 at 6:28 pm #

    Like everyone here, I’ve been concerned about our skies being infested and overdosed with aircraft activity especially as we have a new Oxford Airport and military bases close to the Abingdon region. I developed a dry cough and sore throat and, as a non-smoker and asthma free, I became concerned that something ‘was in the air’ but didn’t realise the significance until I started to research. I’ve written to all six Oxfordshire MPs and the Environment Office who said (unlike NB’s response below suggesting otherwise) their remit was only emissions at ground-level with no power beyond that and that I should write to the civil aviation authority. I sent literature and copy correspondence to my own GP surgery and I posted letters through my 100 neighbours doors . Needless to say not one neighbour responded and the MPs all disclaimed any such activity was occuring. The reply quoted below is the latest email received back from my MP, who points out that she is now the Chair of the Science and Technology Committee. This response either highlights her naivity-ignorance or is deliberately dismissive. I have replied to this email challenging her on many levels but will be sending her this directive with some relish now.
    “Dear Ms D,
    Thank you for your email and letter about chemtrails and geoengineering – I apologise for the delay in my response.
    The Department for Transport (DfT) has emphasised that it is not aware of any matter or aerosol being ejected from aircraft, other than normal exhaust products.
    It is true that other countries have on occasion used weather modification techniques, such as cloud seeding, which causes precipitation by introducing substances into cumulus clouds that cause condensation. However, these techniques are aimed at reducing the locally damaging impacts of hail, or promoting rainfall, and have no impact on climate and should not be considered a form of geo-engineering.
    Importantly, since 1977, cloud seeding and environmental techniques have been subject to international regulation after countries agreed the “Convention of the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques” (ENMOD). This treaty forbids the use of environmental modification techniques in hostile circumstances. The Science and Technology Committee, of which I am now Chair, published a report on this issue back in 2010. You can access it here, and I hope you find this useful.
    More broadly, our local authorities are required to regularly monitor air quality in the area, and to take action to address poor air quality where it exists, helping to ensure that air quality remains within safe standards for local residents. This commitment is underlined by the Air Quality Action Plan 2014. You may also be interested to visit the Oxfordshire Air Quality website, which provides regular and detailed updates of air quality in different parts of the area.
    Thank you again for taking the time to contact me.
    Kind regards,
    Nicola Blackwood MP
    Member of Parliament for Oxford West and Abingdon”…….
    I am also printing off leaflets showing Before/During/After pictures and we have taken lots of video footage of the daily activity with which we are bombarded and handing them out to the local college students, my local supermarkets, my Bank tellers and anyone I might be passing, all of whom immediately look at me oddly but then LOOK UP….! I’m old but worry for my grandchildren who soon won’t know what a REAL blue sky looks like unless it stops. We must all keep up the fight and thank our stars that we have hard working people like you guys providing us with a wealth of information to bombard our government with.

  62. David6th May 2016 at 12:49 am #

    No one and I mean NO ONE has the right to play GOD. Stop poisoning our atmosphere, leave things alone and let nature take its course. If you don’t have your health you don’t have anything, but like government and doctors care, it’s not like they don’t know what is going on, the world’s leaders are all working together.

  63. Mark. O.15th May 2016 at 8:51 pm #

    Hello all, I was on holiday visiting Liverpool in the first week of May 2016 and was horrified when on the dazzle ferry across the Mersey. The skies above where covered with a criss cross of chem trails. I could clearly see that these were not con trails as they were hanging about for most of the day. Other planes were crossing and leaving a normal con trail which made things even more obvious.. What are our governments doing to our planet and why do they think they have the right to do this.. STOP NOW.

  64. Molly Brinkworth16th June 2016 at 11:57 am #

    I have recently watched beautiful blue morning skies get brutally destroyed by aeroplanes destructive leavings, which change the sky to a nasty muggy sky that has no appearance of being normal. Lines that turn into a layer of smog for miles and that don’t go away all day. When one goes on holiday to a remote island in Greece, all that is seen is billowy clouds and blue sky for as far as you can see but the minute the plane lands in Britain you can see lines of fake clouds EVERYWHERE. I don’t understand how this can bring any good to what people think of Britain or the people governing it. It’s disgusting and inhumane to think we don’t get a say in the matter.

    • Big ritchie lar27th June 2016 at 4:18 pm #

      Its a disgrace – that They do it and that joe public doesnt do more to protest. I see chemtrails every day. My job involves travelling across uk and it is everywhere. Most folks i raise it with are super-sceptical and ive got to say i think they are lazy minded. I think soap operas have a lot to do with it but thats another rant, for another time. Im looking out of the window now and can see a nice high altitude silver haze with the normal ” mashed potato” clouds of my childhood and youth underneath – at least they look like proper fluffy clouds. A few weeks ago during march and april the evening sunset made the clouds go a strong pink colour. The effect wasnt just the sunset but every cloud in the sky, and from where i walk my dog i can see right over to the east midlands, and beyond that are the flatlands of lincolnshire and the wolds – have you ever seen a sunset that went across the whole width of the country for day after day? I took loads of folks with me on those walks to share the spectacle. Have since done some research and aluminium tipped fibreglass/chaff is chief suspect for reflecting pink – its happened in lots of places. I go out most evenings to have a look-up and it makes my heart and spirit sink – mankind is so clever but we really shouldnt have been given the opportunity to behave so badly. Honestly, as a species we are only as good as our worst actions and we are very very very bad all over this planet. Im rattling these shackles that stop me taking direct action. We need to have this geoengineering on the table, in your face, Take Over TV and we need the political class to actually “get it” and do something about it – if they have taken bribes or not acted when they could, well they can always fall on their swords and return some honour to the Establishment. Im done – thanks for reading.

  65. Roger21st June 2016 at 11:11 am #

    The way forwRd is to take legal class action , maybe crowd fund through Kickstarter – a collective lawsuit, that will get their attention.

    • James Hodgskiss
      James Hodgskiss29th June 2016 at 2:02 pm #

      Roger, If you would like to do this, I’m sure you would get a lot of support – including CPUK’s.

  66. James Rowan3rd July 2016 at 1:40 pm #

    Hello all!
    I’m new to this site but, well aware of the Geoengineering and weather warfare assaults on humanity. After years of researching this, its obvious to anyone with two active brain cells on duty that the world is under the control of a satanist cult and our “so-called” leaders and governments are totally complicit in these programmes – which are basically, culling and controlling humanity. The British establishment is full of paeedophiles/satan worshippers and freemasons so, how could any good ever come from any of them? The people of the UK need to wake up soon and realise that this government is certainly not serving them or has their best interests at heart , quite the opposite. In fact, this is why the cockroaches are all out in the open now protesting about the Brexit vote. These MPs don’t want the UK to leave the EU because it is paedophile industrial complex which is serving these perverts. If the population really knew what these sick psycopaths running our country were really doing to us, they would be hanging from the lamposts!!!

  67. C Needley12th July 2016 at 10:04 pm #

    This dangerous spraying is happening more frequently over Lincolnshire . It is poisoning our beautiful planet and everyone of us! Time to wake up before it is too late!

  68. Colin Spratley26th July 2016 at 12:27 pm #

    So if i recall as young boy during summer holidays back in the late 1970’s the summers were long hot and mostly deep blue skies not the milky ruin we now have to put up with which is clear evidence of global change caused by this and probably other things that we still haven’t been told the truth about.
    Only a couple of days ago the skies over Weston Super Mare were clear until the appearance of at least 4 trails roughly flying parallel and then crisscrossing over these previous trails left behind were 4 more this time at roughly 90 degrees to the previous trails so forming a lattice like structure which all dissolved into each other several hours later no blue of the original sky could be seen only the milky clouds formed by the vapour trails pathetic thats what I call it they are either experimenting with airbone areosols to see what affect various formulas have on the environment or they are trying to hide something from us to prevent us from seeing it I will leave that up to each individual to determine their own conclusion

  69. martin30th July 2016 at 8:24 pm #

    chemtraills are killing us this is causing mass genocide bees are dying why are you spraying us with alumium and pestecides this is blocking the sun

  70. keith grey14th November 2016 at 9:05 am #

    “Here is your local UK weather forecast for tomorrow, Monday. With the high pressure firmly in charge there will be wall to wall sunshine in most areas in the early morning. No need to reach for the suntan lotion however as the contrail program will soon crisscross the skies leading to high altitude cloud cover by noon and full blanket cloud for the rest of the day.
    Outlook for the rest of the week. It’s no point in me telling you about the conditions caused by the warm front moving in from the Atlantic or the mild air being brought upward from the Iberian peninsula, because, if its sunshine you are waiting for I wouldn’t hold your breath because the same aircraft with spray nozzles will be taking care of that for us all tomorrow and for the rest of the week.
    For the long range weather forecast please look up into the sky and see what’s happening. Have a nice day!”

  71. Aldred14th May 2017 at 8:23 pm #

    Do aircraft lavatories have a defused output?

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Chicken Little Was Right! Or, SAG, Aerial Aerosol Spraying, and ‘Chemtrails’ | Eco Logic - 31st December 2013

    […] Project UK have a Directive called ‘Directive to Ban Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering and Aerial Aerosol Spraying in […]

Leave a Reply

*