An Open Letter to Dr David Keith

Share on Pinterest

Dr Keith is one of the most prominent proponents of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering (SAG). In this open letter, we challenge Dr Keith with a number of concerns regarding the SAG proposal.

Dear Dr Keith,

I have seen your Colbert Report interview where you appear to publicise and promote the idea of Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering (SAG) – namely, the spraying of thousands of tonnes of toxic substances into our atmosphere as an attempt to fight global warming.

SAG, by your own admission, is expected to kill 10,000 people in the first year alone.

Of further concern is the overwhelming amount of evidence that indicates such practices are not mere proposals but are already happening in our skies. (Incidentally, as you will find in The Directive, this would not be the first time the UK population has been covertly sprayed.)

Please would you provide me your responses to each of the following questions:

  1. Aircraft trails that persist, spread and block out the sunlight are now being witnessed on a near-daily basis in the UK (and other countries). So why are you presenting the notion of blocking out sunlight with aircraft trails as a new possibility for the future when it is something that is clearly happening already?
  2. With the SAG proposal, why are you promoting the spraying of toxic chemicals such as sulphuric acid and/or aluminium oxide to block out our sunlight when we are already observing that the same effects – according to our government –  can be achieved with natural condensation trails?
  3. If you believe the sun cannot be blocked out by natural condensation trails, do you concur that all these persistent, spreading trails that we now witness blocking out our sunlight cannot be composed of “essentially pure ice” and are, therefore, not ordinary condensation trails?
  4. To what extent do you believe the plethora of persistent, spreading aircraft trails that we witness today may be contributing to climate change?
  5. If SAG were to commence officially with the spraying of thousands of tonnes of aluminium oxide, should we expect our lower atmosphere to exhibit a grey/silvery haze – much like how we already witness on a near-daily basis?
  6. Would we also experience high levels of aluminium content in rainwater – much like how we are experiencing today?
  7. Would it also be reasonable to expect that, being military planes, the vast majority of geoengineering aircraft leaving persistent trails would not appear on real-time commercial flight-tracking services such as Flightradar24 and Plane Finder – just as we witness today?
  8. Could we also expect that these unidentifiable planes be the ones that would often leave grid patterns in the sky – again, just like we are experiencing today?
  9. To what extent do you believe the persistent, spreading, sunlight-blocking trails that we now commonly experience are contributing to the acknowledged phenomenon of global dimming?
  10. As a result of spraying 20,000 tonnes of sulphuric acid into the atmosphere, you say there will be around 10,000 deaths in the first year. Do you regard that as an acceptable death rate, and – taking into account the higher incidence of terminal illnesses that will result from these activities, along with the increased amounts that will be sprayed in the following years – by how much might the annual death rate increase as time goes on?
  11. What happened to the suggestion of putting 20,000,000 tonnes of aluminium into the atmosphere, as you proposed in 2010 at the AAAS conference in San Diego? And what would be the associated annual death rates expected in this scenario?
  12. You admit concerns over which country controls the SAG “thermostat” and allude to possible resulting conflict. On a similar note, does it also concern you that “chemtrails” were described in the first draft of the USA’s Space Preservation Act as an “exotic weapons system” but was later omitted… I.e., does it concern you that the USA has not only alluded to technologies similar to SAG being be used for military gain but has also made efforts to conceal it – and, by association, may use SAG with that same military intention?

I look forward to your response to each of these questions.

Sincerely,

James Hodgskiss

PS – This is an open letter, published at chemtrailsprojectuk.com and geoengineeringwatch.org where our future correspondence will also be published.

We will send the above letter to Dr Keith on 11 October 2014. In the meantime, if anyone has any comments or suggestions, please leave them here. The above letter was posted to Dr Keith on 11 October 2014 by recorded mail.

Please also help by sharing this article widely. This will not only increase awareness of chemtrails and geoengineering, but will also increase the pressure on Dr Keith to provide a full response.

As soon as we receive it, we will publish Dr Keith’s response on the Chemtrails Project UK website.

Here is the full interview (6 mins 22 secs) of Dr Keith getting a (very entertaining) grilling on the Colbert Report. (The video quality is poor for the first few seconds, but it is fine after that.)

Help spread awareness:
Share on Pinterest

8 Responses to “An Open Letter to Dr David Keith”

  1. CognitiveDissident27th September 2014 at 3:38 pm #

    Good letter. But suggest you leave out reference to 500m population and Guidestones.

    • CPUK27th September 2014 at 10:53 pm #

      Thanks. Couldn’t resist it, but I think you’re right – so have now removed the reference to the Georgia Guidestones.

  2. paul atkinson1st October 2014 at 3:25 pm #

    Good letter james , I would grill him more on the 10 000 expected deaths in the 1st year of sag . Ask him to explain exactly why he is advocating murder because that is exactly what it is and he is directly responsible .

    • CPUK1st October 2014 at 5:01 pm #

      Thanks, Paul. I have expanded on that point now.

  3. Hsaive3rd October 2014 at 12:59 am #

    In this clip from “THE GREAT CULLING”, Keith lied when he claimed he would drop everything (give his life) to fight chemtrails. http://wp.me/p2FjTj-4kP

  4. ron angell29th March 2016 at 1:30 pm #

    University of Florida-http://uf.catalog.fcla.edu/uf.jsp?st=UF022632396&ix=pm&I=0&V=D&pm=1 20 documents on weather modification and weaponization of weather (murder and torture and insurance fraud and real estate fraud) – http://uf.catalog.fcla.edu/uf.jsp?st=UF022632396&ix=pm&I=0&V=D&pm=1 Weather modification: programs, problems, policy, and potential
    by United States: Congress
    Published 1978 i.e. 1979
    Topics Weather control–United States http://uf.catalog.fcla.edu/uf.jsp?st=UF022632396&ix=pm&I=0&V=D&pm=1 http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/popular-science-warns-about-weather-as-a-weapon/

  5. Joe Ceonnia23rd September 2016 at 1:20 am #

    Nano Aluminum and Nano Barium is killing the planet, just ask the folks from down under – ask them about the dying the GREAT BARRIER REEF, it’s almost 80% dead already, completely bleached out! These nano particles of metals are harmful to all living things on earth, that why you have droughts in California and flooding in the Southern States – also in the Northeast States it’s high 80 degrees during the day and low 60’s at night. The Technology is VERY UNPROVEN and I think that’s what Dr. Davis Keith is saying but what he is not saying is he has a start up Company in the business of Geo Engineering the Planet. TSK TSK…

  6. Simon16th February 2017 at 8:52 pm #

    When will people start a class action law suit against this evil man?..

Leave a Reply

*